Server vs Clientside - and when javascript comes into play
Well, my job interview didn't turn out as I had hoped. Well, too bad, but there's nothing I can do about it. 'Not enough experience', they said. Well, they're probably right. Another point, they said, was that I'd rather solve a problem serverside then clientside. They're a heavy-clientside (javascript) company, so I didn't really fit in.
My view on server- and clientside differed from the company's view, I thought.. I first solve something serverside. Nothing fancy, just working. When I feel like it, I create some 'sugar on top': the javascript to help the page load faster (e.g., ajax) and check the user input to generate user-friendlier error handling.
The company is working with javascript-only applications. What they want to create is not possible with server callbacks. I think any userinput will be checked by the server (never trust user input; you could be hacked), but they just trust on javascript. If it doesn't work, the application breaks. And that's ok; it is impossible to work with the application anyway if you don't have JS.
Then it hit me: we didn't really have different views on the javascript subject, we just have different uses for it. While I'm creating websites with some extra sugar on top, they are building applications that require javascript. So it's perfectly reasonable for me to rather solve a problem serverside. For them, it's easier to the the same thing clientside.
Guess I don't have enough experience still.
A bit late, but merry X-mas and (a bit early) a happy new year, folks.
2 Comments:
sounds like you have a better idea of how things *should* be done they they have.
a lucky escape if you ask me...
By anonymouse, at 21 January, 2006 09:45
anonymouse -
First I was considering deleting your comment, but hey, it's a free world.
And, you might have a point. There is a dutch saying that says 'the best skippers stand on the shore', or, it's easier to say how things should be done than to really do things.
On the other hand, it also says it's sometimes harder to do something than to think and talk about it. This isn't necessarily bad: if you haven't thought about how you can improve something, you won't improve.
Could you leave your name next time?
By Okke, at 21 January, 2006 13:37
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home